Spiral electrodeionization device with segregated ionic flows

ABSTRACT

EDI apparatus for demineralizing a liquid flow is assembled in a housing having a cylindrical shape, and includes two metal electrodes, and one or more leafs, each leaf comprising a pair of selectively ion-permeable membranes arranged parallel to each other and spaced apart by spacing elements that allow liquid to flow in the interstitial space between membranes, thus forming an arrangement of dilute and concentrate cells in a desired flow configuration. Spacing elements between membranes, as well as between leaves, can be formed of inert polymer material, ion exchange beads, ion exchange fibers, a combination of two or more these elements, or a porous media incorporating one or more of such elements as an intrinsic part. An inner or central electrode and an outer or perimeter electrode establish a generally uniform and radially-oriented electrical or ionic current between the inner and the outer electrodes, across the helical flow spaces defined by the membrane/spacer windings. One or both electrodes may include a pocket, and the adjacent flow cells lie parallel to the electrode and free of shadowing and field inhomogeneity around a full circumference of the electrode. Flow paths within the helical cells are defined by barrier seals, which may form a path-lengthening maze, while unfilled cell regions may disperse or collect flow within a cell and define pressure gradients promote directional flows. Impermeable barriers between membranes further prevent the feed and concentrate flows from mixing. In various embodiments, seals along or between portions of the flow path may define a multi-stage device, may define separate feed and/or concentrate flows for different stages, and/or may direct the feed and concentrate flows along preferred directions which may be co-current, counter-current or cross-current with respect to each other within the apparatus.

REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of earlier-filed PCT InternationalApplication US2004/034909 filed Oct. 20, 2004, which claimed priority ofU.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/512,661 filed Oct. 20, 2003.

BACKGROUND

The present invention relates to methods and devices for demineralizingfluids, and relates to filtration or treatment cartridges or modules,having a generally cylindrical aspect and constructed with plies ofspirally wound selectively-permeable membranes. It particularly relatesto electrodialysis and electrodeionization devices, wherein themembranes possess ionic selectivity, and the device includes electrodesfor inducing transport of species across the membranes by ionicconduction.

In general, electrodialysis (ED) and so-called electrodeionization (EDI)devices operate by providing a structure that arranges flow channelssuch that a flow of a feed fluid that is to be treated is channeledbetween two ion exchange membranes of opposite exchange type, while anelectrical potential is applied across the membranes transverse to theflow to maintain an ionic current that demineralizes the feed fluid,moving ionizable species from the feed fluid in one channel, through themembranes, and into adjacent channels, thereby producing a demineralizedproduct flow from the feed. Spacers position successive membranes apartto define the fluid treatment channels or “dilute” flow spaces.

A subclass of electrodialysis (ED) devices, often referred to aselectrodeionization (EDI) devices, further include a packing of ionexchange material, typically beads or felt, as a flow-pemeable packingwithin the flow treatment channels and, in certain constructions, withinthe adjacent mineral-receiving channels. The presence of exchangematerial in the treatment channels or cells enhances the active fluidinteraction area and the capture of ions from the feed, and provides astationary transfer medium of good electrical and ionic conductivity fortransporting the captured ions to and across the surrounding membranes.This construction offers a robust and efficient mechanism foreffectively separating many dissolved materials from the flow along arelatively short flow path. The ion exchange material is continuouslymaintained in an at least partially regenerated (active) state by watersplitting.

Over many years, developers of these units have explored the suitabilityand operating characteristics of ED and EDI devices with a range of flowchannel geometries and flow velocities, various membranes defining cellsof different fixed or even progressive thickness, and a variety of ionexchange fillings distributed in various localized patterns (such asstripes, bands, special monotype or mixed beds) and other variations.For certain applications, the use of beads with special sorption,catalytic or other properties has been described to stabilize operatingcharacteristics or effect other aspects of treatment.

In these devices, the feed fluid flows one or more times through“dilute” spaces or cells, giving up its ions, to emerge as asubstantially demineralized or treated product flow, while a separatefluid in adjacent “concentrate” or “brine” cells receives the mineralsstripped from the feed by ionic conduction through the membranes,together with such non-ionic small molecules as may pass through themembranes. Various physical implementations of ED and EDI units areknown. The majority of commercial devices, particularly EDI devices,have historically employed an architecture based on flat plate“stacks”—arrangements of many cells formed by stacking substantiallyoblong membranes, spacers, and screens—-collectively forming manycells—between endplates, with electrodes and usually ports or manifoldspositioned at the ends of the stack. Similar stacks of disk-shaped cellsare historically known. In addition to these “stack” constructions, manypublications also describe, and several companies have commerciallymarketed, cylindrically-shaped ED or EDI devices having cells formedbetween ion exchange membranes that are spirally-wound about a pipe orcore. These devices have electrodes at radially inner and outerpositions to apply a substantially radial electrical field between thecore and the outer shell of the cylindrical device.

ED (unfilled) devices have found use in treating a number of foodindustry fluids. A rolled spiral construction similar to the spiral EDor EDI units has also long been used in fabricating cross-flow reverseosmosis (RO), microfiltration (MF) and other types offiltration/separation modules for use with feed streams of alimentaryfluids or fermentation product streams, so the spiral architecture iswell accepted in that industry for its flow dynamic characteristics,plumbing requirements, ability to handle elevated pressure and otherdesirable properties. These other spiral-wound filtration devicestypically rely upon elevated pressure to drive the filtration process orproduct through a membrane, rather than upon an electric potential totransport ionizable components across a membrane. Such spiral filterconstructions typically permit only small deflections, and are able tosustain high pressures without rupturing membranes. Applicant believesthat a spiral EDI construction may potentially enjoy a pressureresistant construction that would desirably permit enhanced throughput,longer, more effective treatment path length or other improved property.

Among the published or commercially promoted spiral ED and EDI products,early examples of Ionics, Incorporated, as shown in U.S. Pat. No.2,741,591, describe various directions for the respective dilute andconcentrate flows, both in relation to the inner and outer electrode andwith respect to each other. The Christ, A.G. company of Switzerland hasmore recently marketed spiral EDI devices, of which examples are shownin their U.S. Pat. No. 5,376,253, entitled Apparatus for the ContinuousElectrochemical Desalination of Aqueous Solutions, naming inventorsRychem et al. The construction shown in that patent is a spiral woundEDI with inner and outer electrodes, having its fluid treatment dilutecells sealed to the wall of, and opening into, the inner electrode(which also serves as a central flow pipe), and having its concentratecells open to the surrounding cylindrical wall that forms acounter-electrode.

Another commercial EDI unit of spiral architecture, originally developedin China, employs mesh-filled wound concentrate envelope and provides anaxially oriented dilute flow between the windings. This device ismarketed in the United States by Omexell, Inc. of Houston, Tex. TheOmexell device is illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 6,190,528, naminginventors Xiang Li and Gou-Lin Luo. In that construction, a central pipeis both an electrode and a water distributor, while wound metal strip orwire forms the outer electrode. Two membranes surrounding a mesh webform an envelope without any exchange bead filling, and the envelope isspirally-wound about the central pipe to form the concentrate flowspace(s) of the device. The alternate regions between successive turnsof the envelope are filled with ion exchange resin beads to constitutethe dilute channels. The input feed flow and the treated product outputproceed through the exchange bead-filled space along an axial direction,from one end of the cylinder to the other, while the concentrate flowsfrom the product feed inlet (embodiment #2, shown in FIG. 4 of theaforesaid '528 patent) or from a slot along half the centralelectrode/pipe (embodiment #1, shown in FIGS. 1-3 of that patent), alonga helical path through the wound concentrate envelope and into (or backinto) the central electrode/pipe. Thus, the Omexell construction winds amembrane/spacer/membrane concentrate envelope, and fills the spacebetween windings with resin to form the dilute passages. The resinfilling is stated to be replaceable.

Some spiral EDI devices may employ a central pipe as an electrode thatdoubles as a fluid manifold. Early flat plate EDI stacks were arrangedwith their dilute and concentrate flows in parallel planes but at aright angle to each other, or at a meandering angle with respect to eachother, while many modern flat plate rectangular or oblong EDI stacks arenow configured so that dilute and concentrate flows are arranged inclosely-spaced parallel sheets in either a co-current or counter-currentarrangement. Spiral EDI devices tend to arrange a major portion of thetwo flow paths cross-current, with one flow being axial and the otherlocally across the axis along a globally helical path following thespiral contour of the membrane envelopes that define the dilute and/orbrine cells. The spiral architecture permits one to define differentrelative path lengths and flow rates of the two fluids (for example, theaxial path may be shorter than the spiral path), and may allow someflexibility or advantages in other respects, such as ease of re-fillingor refurbishment, over clamped-plate stack designs.

The Omexell spiral EDI construction is advertised as being readilyserviceable, and the '528 patent mentions replacing the dilute cellexchange beads every day by opening the ends of the cylinder, blowingout the exchange beads, and re-filling. That Company has filed a numberof This accessibility of the beads in the construction of the '528patent has been advertised to promote the product by contrasting it tothe situation applying to conventional stacks of rectangularconstruction mentioned above, in which the separate replacement of theexchange beads is generally either quite cumbersome (for example,requiring disassembly and re-assembly of the stack, or requiring acomplex emptying and filling regimen), or else is not feasible (becausethe dilute cells are each formed as discrete permanently sealedenvelope-cells that cannot be opened). However, it is not entirely clearfrom the '528 patent or from the commercial product description why beadreplacement is deemed necessary. It is possible that the patent, being ashort technical description drafted by a third party at an early stageof development, contains an erroneous description. It is also possiblethat the common practice in China of relying upon ion exchange beds forprimary water treatment influenced the inventors to emphasize, in the'528 patent, the replaceability of exchange beads, so that the new EDItechnology would be seen not as an unproven and different technology,but as simply an augmented form of the accepted and proven treatmentinvolving periodic renewal of an ion exchange bed. It is also possible,however, that the device described in the '528 patent was prone toscaling as a result of the minerals (such as calcium and silica) presentin the local waters and the nature of fluid flows and electrical fieldswithin the device, and that resin replacement was necessary in thatparticular context.

EDI units were first developed forty or fifty years ago. At ahistorically early period of this development, the bead filling wasoften more or less readily accessible, and one could replace orregenerate the beads separately at frequent intervals to achieve adesired degree of treatment. This allowed the treatment regimen to relyin part on the bead storage capacity (like that of a conventional ionexchange bed) to accommodate part of the removal burden or toeffectively remove certain ones of the less mobile ions. Generally,however, modern stacks and EDI devices are designed to operate withoutdisassembly or resin replacement for extended times—a period up toseveral years. During operation, a portion of the exchange bead fillingis continuously electrically regenerated, and the devices are operatedin a steady state. While certain feed water quality standards may bespecified to assure long term stability, occasional total regenerationand/or cleaning or reversal cycles my be performed to address scale-likebuild-up or performance deterioration, and to prevent any fouling orscaling from irreversibly impairing operation.

Without dwelling further on generalities or specific constructions, itmay be said that EDI constructions of both the stack and the spiralarchitectures rely on the capture of ions by exchange beads and thetransport of captured ions through a chain of one or more beads eitherto, or closer to, the exchange membranes that actually transfer the ionsout of and separate the ions from the feed flow/dilute path. Theexchange beads are continuously regenerated (for example, by hydroniumor hydroxide ions that are created by water splitting at places of highfield intensity, such as heterogeneous bead/bead or bead/membranejunctions), and the devices are generally set up to operate in a steadystate on a given feed for extended periods of time. However, the rate orflow distribution and other factors governing all these effects are suchthat conditions of high concentration of specific ions, extreme pH, orflow stagnation may all arise in use, and certain combinations of theseconditions may pose control problems, impair the efficiency or degree oftreatment, or risk introducing irreversible membrane damage and/orlocalized occurrences of resin or membrane scaling within the device.The dimensions and geometry of the flow cells, the nature of theexchange filling formulations, and details of the hydraulic plumbing mayall be important in addressing such problems, and a certain amount ofpretreatment of the feed fluid is also generally required to assure asuitable initial feed quality that will not give rise to problems overthe long term. Extensive industrial operating experience further allowsone to specify operating parameters and protocols to follow for eachdevice with various feeds in order to safely avoid, address or minimizelong term performance deterioration.

One aspect of EDI device construction deserves special mention, namelythat the membranes as well as the exchange beads employed in thesedevices are swellable, and generally undergo changes in dimensionbetween their dry and hydrated forms. Some heterogeneous exchangemembranes may swell by twenty percent, and wetted beds of exchange beadsalso increase their volume and may exert high pressure if undulyconfined. Such swelling may impair the flow impedance, or may affect theintegrity of membranes or structural elements. This has lead variousmanufacturers of EDI stacks to propose assembly steps such aspre-soaking membranes for lengthy periods before assembly; using morerigid intermediate frame or spacer assemblies having multiple lands,bosses, beads and/or registration pins to secure the membranes, confinethe exchange beads and maintain alignment and sealing; filling of beadsby precisely-measured quantities in a dry or salted form to achieveprecisely quantified swelling, or filling as pre-formed blocks or gelsof exchange media; or dynamic filling of cells by a fluidized andpossibly salted slurry, to assure a desired cell packing.

For spiral constructions, the dimensional instability of membrane andbead media, together with the local slippage introduced by winding atdifferent radii, and the relatively large length of individualmembranes, raise additional potential problems of membrane spacing orsupport, stress, shrinking or buckling, and cracking. A number ofinvestigators have proposed the use of fixed and pre-formed spacingelements such as bumps, posts or ribs rather than beads, either asseparate elements, or as features formed on the membrane surface, toavoid irregular spacing or undue mechanical stresses and to maintain adesired membrane-to-membrane spacing.

Within this general picture, various problems or perceived problems ordesign constraints may arise. For example, in the 1960's it had beenshown that certain properties of EDI operation are optimized withuniform sized ion exchange beads, and with thin filled cells; in thecommercial field, some industry advocates have long urged that a cellthickness defined by a low number of exchange beads (e.g., 4-10 beads)is optimal. Thick cells have also been advocated for specific purposes,such as high silica removal achieved by inducing an upward pH shift duedelayed hydroxyl removal under polarized operation. It is apparent thata small cell thickness introduces hydraulic flow limitations that willvary greatly as a function of exchange bead size and feed fluidviscosity; theoretical or empirical modeling done with water would notnecessarily apply to systems for treating common alimentary fluids.Moreover, with any feed, local current density may vary within the manycells of a conventional EDI stack or device, and is substantiallyaffected by local variations in distribution of exchange beads, as wellas by channeling or local variations in flow that may occur. Thesecurrent variations and resulting potentials may profoundly alter theintended operating performance. In addition, in spiral devices, currentdensity increases inversely with radial position, raising furthercontrol or operational difficulties. Moreover, fluids such as alimentaryor fermentation fluids are notoriously prone to fouling—both functionalfouling of exchange bead surfaces and functionality, and physicalblockage of flow through the exchange beds. Fluidized exchange beds havebeen employed to address the latter problem, but this approach cannot beemployed with the exchange bead filling of EDI devices, because it isinconsistent with the requirement of direct contact between exchangebeads and the constricted space existing between the exchange membranes.

For such reasons, the fabrication and operation of EDI demineralizationdevices remain rather complex and costly, and each particularconstruction may have its own limitations or drawbacks.

There is thus a need for new constructions of such devices, for devicesthat offer improved cost or ease of manufacture, and for EDI devicesthat provide different or improved operating abilities.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

One or more of these and other desirable features are achieved inaccordance with the present invention by an apparatus for demineralizinga fluid flow. The apparatus includes two conductive electrodes, and oneor more windings, each winding comprising at least a pair of selectivelypermeable membranes, generally a cation exchange membrane and an anionexchange membrane, together with a spacing element. The cation and anionexchange membranes are arranged parallel to each other, and the spacingelement maintains a separation or gap that allows liquid to flow in thespace between membranes. In accordance with one aspect of the invention,the assembly of membranes and spacer (herein called a “leaf”) or severalsuch leaves, are spirally-wound around a central cylindrical core formedof electrically non-conducting material, while maintaining a space, forexample by means of a further spacer, between successive leafs, orbetween the successive windings of a single leaf. The assembled devicecomprises two types of cell or chambers which are adjacent to each otherin alternation, and the cells are defined by the spacing elements andthe further spacers, forming flow chambers, i.e., dilute and concentratechambers within the device. In a preferred embodiment both the diluteand the concentrate chambers each include ion exchange material. Inaccordance with another aspect of the device, the spacers are sheetsthat may be handled, rolled and manipulated during assembly of thedevice.

The spacing element between membranes, as well as the further spacer,can be formed of inert polymer material, ion exchange beads, ionexchange fibers, a combination of two or more these elements, or aporous medium (such as a sponge, felt or sheet) incorporating one ormore of such elements as an intrinsic part.

In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the apparatus isassembled in a housing having a cylindrical shape, and includes tworadially spaced apart metal or conductive components which act aselectrodes. At least one of these conductive components is placed at aradially inner position surrounding the central core and the other ofthe conductive components is placed at a radially outer position nearthe perimeter, thus establishing a generally radially-orientedelectrical or ionic current between the inner and the outer electrode,across the helically disposed flow spaces defined within and between themembrane/spacer windings of a rolled leaf assembly. One or preferablyeach of the electrodes may be formed as a sheet metal spiral, with aradially-extending opening that receives the end of a leaf, andpositions the active flow cells of the device in a uniform electricfield free of shadowing and hot spots. The opening forms a sealed andisoelectric cage about the end of the cell-defining layers.

A preferred electrode is formed as a conductive sheet wound in a volutecircumscribing more than one full turn, with an axially-extendingstrip-like gap or opening defined in an overlap region between theradially inner and the radially outer edges of the volute. The openingaccommodates passage of the end of a leaf along a tangential pathparallel to the electrode surface into a sealed pocket of the electrode(e.g., between the inner surface and the edge of the outer surface ofthe volute), while fluid communication with the inter-membrane flowspace and connection to a fluid port or manifold may be effected throughthe electrode. The leaf entering or exiting the electrode pocketapproaches at a tangential angle, and may therefore wrap closelyparallel to the electrode surface, providing an exceptionally uniformcurrent distribution around the electrode, free of the shadowing andinhomogeneities that occur with prior art constructions that employclamping, membrane doubling or other irregular fixing or terminationstructures at the electrode. The construction also avoids introducingbrine manifold shorting or back diffusion that may, to some extent,plague prior art constructions. A membrane may also be sealed orattached to the electrode in the overlap region, simplifying fabricationof the spiral-rolled cell structure.

While it is preferred that the electrodes be formed of continuous metalsheet in this aspect of the invention, in other embodiments theelectrode may have openings and may take the form, e.g., of a metalscreen, or of multiple discrete but electrically interconnected segmentsthat are arranged to form a generally equipotential surface contour. Forexample, discrete elements may be shingled or arranged adjacent eachother to form a cylinder (of substantially constant radius), open volute(of somewhat increasing radius) or similar shape that defines a completecircumferential turn of equipotential surface.

In EDI devices of the present invention, the leaf (or leaves) are woundsuch that, as viewed in cross-section, dilute and concentrate spacesalternate adjacent each other along the radial direction, and preferablythe envelope forms the concentrate channel. Preferably the feed flow ofliquid to be treated enters the apparatus (e.g., enters the dilutecells) at one end of the device between the inner and outer core, andpasses along a treatment path parallel to the axis of the device throughthe dilute cells between membranes, while an ion-receiving concentrateflow is maintained in a corresponding concentrate cells defined on theother side of each membrane, within the helical inter-membrane spacesdescribed above.

Flow paths taken by flows within the helical cells are defined by one ormore seals that extend between pairs of adjacent membranes, and whichmay constitute edge seals, blocking or channeling barriers, or apath-lengthening maze to direct the flow. Other seals on one or moremembranes may define a dry or inert region of the spiral in a positioneffective to prevent the feed and concentrate flows from mixing, forexample, at the ends of a leaf.

In accordance with embodiments of this aspect of the invention, sealsalong or between portions of the flow path may define a multi-stagedevice, may define separate feed and/or concentrate flows for differentstages, may define relative flow rates of the concentrate and/or dilutefluids, and/or may operate to define functional sub-regions of thetreatment path. The seals may also direct the feed and concentrate flowsalong preferred directions or along preferred relative orientations, ormay direct the concentrate to maintain separate flows of differentgroups of removed species in one or more portions of the paths sodefined. The relative orientation of feed and concentrate flow onopposite sides of a membrane may, for example, be different at differentpositions along the flow path, based on a considerations such as theprevailing ionic species and their concentrations, the electricalresistance, the polarization state and/or pH in that region, the type ofions (such as scale-forming, monovalent, divalent or specific ions)transported in that or upstream flow regions, and the mineral or gasburden, of the dilute, the concentrate, or both flows. In someembodiments, the seals may operate to form internal distributionmanifolds, for example directing a portion of the feed or partiallytreated feed into the concentrate path; or may operate as pressureregulators to adjust the pressure in a cell relative to adjacent cellsin order to assure proper flow or to resist pinching of cell walls.

Flow may also be segregated on the concentrate side by oriented strandsof a mesh spacer, or by bands of impermeable material placed on thespacer in an oriented pattern. In one preferred embodiment of thisaspect of the invention, the dilute flow follows a path parallel to theaxis of the cylindrical winding, and the concentrate flow is directedsuch that it remains in or flows parallel to a plane perpendicular tothe axis. Thus, as bivalent metals such as calcium, followed by ionssuch as sulfate or carbonate, are successively removed from the axialdilute flow and enter the concentrate cells, each of the removedimpurities remains in a band within the cell as it flows toward the celloutlet, and does not mix with the other removed species. The segregatedflow effectively prevents scale from forming. In another or furtherembodiment of this aspect of the invention, the dilute cells may have abanded filling wherein the resin in a band at a stage along thefeed-product flow path is of a type selected to enhance removal of thespecies (for example, of, to capture scale forming metallic ions) inthat stage, or to selectively block capture or transmembrane passage ofa species (for example, sulfate or carbonate) until a later positionwhere it may encounter a resin selected to promote capture. Such bandedresin filling thus sharpens the separation of the different potentiallyscale-forming species that may be present in the feed.

In accordance with another aspect of the invention, structures normalizecurrent density to promote uniform and effective demineralization. Adistribution of dilute inlet and/or outlet passages may define aradially varying flow distribution tailored to the prevailing electricalcurrent density.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention will be understood by those skilled in the art from thedescription herein of several embodiments and illustrative details ofconstruction, and some of its desirable variations and features,together with figures thereof, wherein

FIG. 1 is a schematic plan view of a first embodiment of acylindrically-shaped spiral EDI apparatus in accordance with the presentinvention, illustrating one layout of representative components;

FIG. 1A illustrates a method according to one aspect of the inventionfor forming cells of the EDI apparatus of FIG. 1;

FIG. 1B is a plan view of a first membrane envelope illustrating aspectsof sealing in accordance with the present invention for defining cellsof an EDI device such as schematically illustrated in FIG. 1;

FIG. 1C is a cross sectional view of the cells constructed as in FIGS.1A and 1B;

FIG. 1D illustrates a manifold construction useful in the cells of FIGS.1A-1C;

FIG. 2A is a plan view of a second membrane envelope and associatedcomponents for a spiral EDI device as illustrated in FIG. 1;

FIG. 2B is a vertical section taken parallel to the roll axis of aspiral EDI device made with the membrane envelope of FIG. 2A;

FIG. 3 illustrates an inner electrode construction of one prototypeembodiment in accordance with one aspect of the invention;

FIG. 4 illustrates an outer electrode construction of the prototypeembodiment in accordance with this aspect of the invention;

FIGS. 5, 6, 7 and 7A are plan views of additional embodiments ofexchange membrane envelopes and associated details for other embodimentsof a spiral EDI device as illustrated in FIG. 1;

FIG. 8 illustrates a detail of a sparse bilayer screen spacerconstruction having cross-path deflectors for uniform cell conductivityand enhanced treatment;

FIGS. 9A-B illustrates details of a flow port construction for practiceof embodiments of the invention;

FIG. 10 illustrate flow profiling of the invention with the ports ofFIGS. 9A-B; and

FIGS. 11A-B illustrate concentrate segregation with banded spiralfilling according to another aspect of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 is a schematic plan view of a first embodiment 10 of acylindrical EDI apparatus in accordance with the present invention,showing general layout of components. The EDI apparatus 10 includes ahousing illustratively comprised of a bottom flange plate B, a topflange plate T and a cylindrical body C that together define a generallycylindrical vessel or fluid-confining enclosing chamber. A membrane roll15, of which several examples are described below, is wound around acentral core 12 within the housing. Illustratively, a membrane rollsupport 18, the structure of which may take various forms, supports themembrane roll. An inner electrode 14 surrounds the central core 12, andis coupled to a first current leader 14 a for connection to an externalpower source, and an outer electrode 16, coupled to a second currentleader 16 a, substantially surrounds the membrane roll 15. The membraneroll is wound in a spiral in the annular space between the twoelectrodes 14, 16. Within various constraints discussed below, one orboth of these electrodes may be a continuous sheet, may be perforated,may be a mesh or screen-like sheet, or may be formed of interconnecteddiscrete electrically conductive elements which generally span a contoursurrounding the center or the periphery, respectively. The electrode,whether screen-like, perforated, or continuous has its conductivesurface sufficiently extensive to provide what is substantially anequipotential surface around the inside axis (respectively, outsideperiphery) of the membrane roll. Preferably, as described further belowin connection with FIGS. 2A and 2B, at least one and preferably both ofthe electrodes are continuous sheet electrode that span more than onefull turn to define a pocket or opening to receive the end of themembrane roll tangentially into the electrode.

This overall geometry positions the flow spaces defined between a pairmembranes generally traverse to the (radial) direction of current pathswhich extend between the inner and outer electrodes 14, 16. Theelectrode opening allows an inter-membrane flow space to terminate in aninert or field-free region, while avoiding the localized regions ofshadowing and field inhomogeneity previously caused by clamping,blocking or doubled membranes, and sealing structures of the prior art.The electrode pocket construction also allows a dilute chamber sealingthat isolates the treated stream from excessive electrolyteconcentrations near the electrodes. No separate electrolyte chambers orstreams are needed.

The central core 12, which may be substantially contiguous to the innerelectrode, is preferably a non-conductive structural element such as apolymer pipe, or if conductive is not energized to define a drivingfield. It may be sized so that the inner electrode sits directly againstits outer surface, thus serving as a structural or supporting member,and it may include appropriate apertures to serve as the fluid inlet oroutlet for portions of the device. In accordance with one importantaspect of the present invention, the inner electrode may have a diameteror cross-dimension that is a substantial fraction of the diameter of theouter electrode, so that the active windings of the membrane roll arepositioned in a relatively narrow cylindrical annulus between the innerand the outer electrodes which experiences a fairly uniform field. Thisannular region has a radial extent less than, e.g., half the diameter ofthe outer electrode, preferably under about thirty percent, and mostpreferably under about twenty percent. The relatively similar magnitudeof the radii of the two electrodes enhances electrical operation bykeeping the distribution of current density fairly uniform: the currentdensity near the inner turns of the membrane roll remains relativelylimited. For example, other things being equal, the relative currentdensities would vary inversely with the relative areas, hence radii, ofthe electrodes. Setting the inner electrode diameter close to the outerelectrode diameter may be done such that the ratio of inner and outerelectrode areas, hence the nominal relative current densities at theouter and inner electrode surfaces, may be under 1:2, under 1:(1.5) oreven below about 1:(1.2). While not explicitly shown, various fittings,passages, ports and conduits may pass through the housing and/or thesupport 18 to introduce, distribute, collect or deliver the feed stream,treated product and concentrate flows. Some example will be discussedbelow with regard to particular constructions.

The membrane roll 15 includes one or more “leafs”, each leaf beingrolled or spirally-wound about the inner electrode and central core. Aleaf includes two selectively ion permeable membranes, and these arearranged so that the membrane roll defines adjacent or parallel sets ofdilute (feed) and concentrate (brine) flow paths positioned in theannular space between electrodes. In accordance with a principal featureof one aspect of the present invention, the dilute and brine cells areconstituted by spacers having flow paths defined by variousflow-blocking or flow-directing seals between adjacent membrane surfacesof a leaf. In some cases, flow-enhancing spacer regions are alsopositioned to achieve a desired pattern of flow direction and magnitudewithin the housing. The geometry and pattern of the flow paths may beconfigured in several ways according to the invention so as to enhanceflow treatment characteristics, such as increasing ion removal,decreasing back-diffusion, scaling or other undesired effect, orenhancing or controlling other characteristics of operation. Thesefeatures will be understood from the following specific examples.

FIG. 1A schematically illustrates a method of manufacture in accordancewith one aspect of the present invention. As shown, a membrane roll 15as described above is formed of a single continuous leaf 20 using acontinuous sheet of anion exchange membrane 22, a brine cell spacer 24,a continuous sheet of cation exchange membrane 26 and a dilute cellspacer 28. The brine cell spacer 24 may consist of one or more plies ofa flexible non-woven screen mesh, such as a ten to seventy mil thickpolyethylene or other fluid-compatible material of suitable thicknessand screen size that, after assembly, provides a distributed supportbetween the two membranes adjacent to it while permitting fluid to flowthrough the layer occupied by the mesh. The spacer in preferredconstructions includes other elements in its assembly, particularlyconductive and/or ion exchange beads distributed to constitute asuitably fluid-permeable but ionically- or electrically-conductiveinter-membrane filling. Preferably, the spacer is a web comprised of oneor more mesh sheets having ion exchange beads permanently or temporarilystabilized thereby, interspersed therein, or affixed or adhered thereto.Such a sheet may be handled with ease during assembly of the EDIdevices. The body of the screen, e.g., the filaments or crossedfilaments, assures a minimum inter-membrane spacing, while the beadsprovide distributed membrane-contacting support and a certain level ofelectrical conduction (in the concentrate space) or of ion-capture andion-conductivity or transport activity (in the dilute space). In apresently preferred embodiment, the concentrate compartment preferablyemploys only cation exchange beads, while in the dilute compartment aspacer layer having beads of both cation and anion exchange types willgenerally be desired for capture and removal of all ionizable species. Apreferred spacer assembly 24 includes both a screen mesh, and ionexchange beads or conductive media, which together determine the cellthickness, flow impedance and other flow characteristics, and theconductivity and overall efficacy of demineralization. The dilute screenpreferably also serves a bead-segregation function, allowing dilute cellfillings in which beads are segregated by type-the anion exchange beadsand cation exchange beads are retained in separate physical positions.

A few representative dimensions will be given here simply as an aid tovisualization of commercially useful sizes of the spiral EDI devicescontemplated by the invention, without, however limiting the inventionto such sizes. The axial length of the apparatus may be on the order ofabout one-quarter to about one meter or longer, while the device mayhave a diameter of under ten to about sixty centimeters. The spiral flowcells defined by the rolled membrane and spacers may extend up toseveral meters or longer, and the path of fluid flow within the spiralspace or layer of a roll of given diameter may be constrained to anaxial or a helical direction or may follow a path comprised of severalsegments changing in direction or type. The inter-membrane space iswell-defined with spacer material comprising one or more screens and adefined exchange bead filling. It is preferred that the filling of ionexchange beads be a relatively spare filling, as described in commonlyowned PCT International Application PCT/US03/28815 entitled SPARSE MEDIAEDI APPARATUS AND METHOD, filed in the United States PCT ReceivingOffice on Sep. 12, 2003. The disclosure of that internationalapplication is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.Briefly, that patent application describes methods of forming ionexchange fillings consisting of a layer of scattered beads, or arelatively complete monolayer, bi-layer or various striped, banded, orotherwise segregated layers of ion exchange beads, in thin EDI cellsthat operate with enhanced electrical efficiency or control and exhibitlow and well controlled flow impedance characteristics. These layers,which preferably include a screen in addition to the exchange beads,promote extremely uniform inter-membrane spacing and support, and inoperation they achieve enhanced electrical efficiency and reducedresidual contamination. They also operate dependably with long flowpaths, allow a greater number of parallel cells in a given radial lengthof the winding, and present a flow cross-section that remains relativelyfree of channeling.

Thus, in accordance with one important aspect of the present invention,a spiral EDI device is constructed having cells formed by the interiorof one or more thin rollable envelope assemblies that feature both amesh web and a sparse filling of ion exchange beads. Advantageously, bypermanently or temporarily bonding or sticking the beads to the meshweb, a sheet or a continuous web of screen/bead spacer material may beformed, and the leaf structures, e.g., a bead-loaded spacer layer, aspacer/membrane or a membrane/spacer/membrane layer ormembrane/spacer/membrane/spacer layer, may then be rolled in a discreteor a continuous operation as shown in FIG. 1A.

When the layer or cell structure employs a sparse filling, a so-called“short diffusion path” or “shallow shell” resin may be used to helpcontrol or match the electrical resistances of the resins inconstructions wherein two or more resins are placed next to each otherin a common electrical field, or to enhance efficiency when resins ofdifferent diameters are to be placed together. These beads will alsoregenerate faster after a clean-in-place procedure or after beingassembled in salt form, and are expected to generally operate andregenerate noticeably more efficiently in a sparsely filled EDI device,where they will exhibit very sharply defined bleed-down times afterregeneration or reversal.

Various protocols may be employed to attach a scattered or continuousmonolayer of beads to the screen (for example, with individual beadsheld in the openings of a screen having a mesh size roughly equal to thebead diameter), or to attach a substantially full monolayer of beads toeach side of the screen (for example by treating the screen withadhesive and then cascading ion exchange beads against each side of thescreen to capture and bind the beads.) In each case, the bead/spacerassembly may then be handled and manipulated freely, enabling a bulk orsemi-continuous process of rolling and assembly to produce a finishedEDI device. When cation and anion exchange beads are placed on oppositesides of the dilute screen, the dilute screen should be oriented in thefinal assembly to have the cation exchange beads on its side contiguousto the cation exchange membrane, and to have the anion exchange beads onits anion exchange membrane side. Furthermore, when rolled between aninner and an outer electrode, the dilute cell spacers are preferablyoriented such that a cation exchange membrane lies on the cathode sideof the cell and the anion exchange membrane lies on the anode side ofthe cell.

In thin spacers cells of the above-described construction, the screenmesh and bead size may be selected such that the screen maintainsseparation of the bead layers on opposite sides of the mesh, and suchthat the beads and screen assure an appropriate total inter-membranespacing, which may be selected in the range of under about onemillimeter to at most several millimeters. When beads are attached torespective sides of the mesh in this manner, the mesh size may also beselected such that beads of opposite type contact each other through themesh openings, without migrating through the openings. In theseconstructions, it is preferred that during fabrication, the screen becoated with a contact adhesive to capture and hold the respective beads,but that the beads themselves lack adhesive; this assures that the beadsurface remains active, and that the bead-to-bead junctions that occurin the completed assembly are direct conductive contacts with noadhesive interlayer or other impairment of electrical or ionic contact.As described in the aforesaid international patent application, theseconstructions assure a useful level of water splitting, but do notintroduce extraneous reverse junctions that would throw salt or causeelectrical inefficiency. When different exchange types are segregated onopposite sides of the mesh, certain one-sided barriers or diverters mayalso be provided along the flow path to further enhance efficiency bycausing the dilute stream to meander back and forth across the screen,i.e., from the cation side of the cell to the anion side and back to thecation side so that the fluid passes through both exchange bead layers.This construction which applicant refers to as “s-layering” and which isschematically shown in FIG. 8 below, assuring that the treated fluidcontacts both types of exchange bead, offers the performance advantagesassociated with zebra- or layered-filling, and also avoids the creationof localized regions of irregular conductivity and promotes a moreuniform current distribution, because the two types of beads contacteach other in series across the cell. Therefore, the same current mustpass through both the anion and cation exchange beads, despite theirrelative capture affinities or ion transport efficiencies and theprevalent ionic burden in the feed fluid. As a result, the removal ofanions and cations from the flow therefore each proceed at comparablerates, and the flow is not subjected to irregular patches of speciesdepletion and polarization. Moreover, the lack of “granularity” tends toprevent localized regions of high pH that might otherwise be prone tomembrane scaling.

As shown schematically in FIG. 1A, a process 100 for forming the leafsof EDI devices of the present invention involves providing a sheet 110of anion exchange membrane, placing a sheet 115 comprised of one or morelayers of a screen or mesh loaded with exchange beads on or adjacent thesheet 110, and covering the mesh/bead sheet 115 with a sheet of cationexchange membrane 120. The two membranes may be sealed together alongone or more edges, as discussed further below, forming an envelopestructure about the mesh; this may be done, for example, to form aconcentrate cell envelope structure. The envelope is assembled with anadditional screen layer 125 having suitable exchange beads, which, forthe dilute cell spacer layer, will generally be of both anion and cationexchange type, and the membranes and spacers are then rolled to form aspiral EDI unit. Such process of manufacture is indicated schematicallyby the arrangement of rollers 130 in FIG. 1A. In practice, the assemblyprocess will employ various guides and brakes to maintain web tension,and particular ones of the layers may terminate or extend beyond others,as discussed below, to effect suitable end geometries and to suitablyposition electrode, spacer cell or other functional components of thedevice. Various subsidiary steps or components, such as addition of flowdeflectors, spacer shims, and edge gaskets or seals, some of which stepsor components are discussed further below, are not specifically shownbut these may be effected at appropriate points along the line as thefirst membrane, spacer or other web passes along the stages for assemblyof the spacers and membranes in an envelope/spacer roll. This basicstructure is wound and assembled with the electrode and core structures,and mounted within a cylindrical vessel to form the complete EDI device.An electrode may itself constitute a wall of the a vessel, although itis necessary to have at least some portions of the vessel beelectrically non-conductive to avoid electrode shorting and/or potentialshock hazards. In one prototype embodiment, electrodes are formed offoil, and may be assembled in a process wherein the first and last turnsof the membrane/spacer assembly are wound with and conform to theelectrodes.

On a global scale, flow paths in the assembled EDI device areimplemented with the dilute (feed-product) flow proceeding within thespiral-rolled spacers that constitute the dilute cells and brine cells.In the dilute cell, the flow may preferably be parallel to thelongitudinal axis of the device, while in the concentrate or brinecells, flow proceeds along one or more directions, examples of which areillustrated below, within the spiral-rolled envelope(s) that define thecells. Within at least some cells—illustratively the concentratecells—the flow is confined and its direction further determined byimpermeable seals extending between the opposed surfaces of the twomembranes on both sides of a spacer. These seals may confine, deflect,orient or concentrate the flow in various ways, discussed further below,and they are preferably implemented by laying down one or more strips ofa viscous sealant, adhesive tape or band in desired positions. Seals maybe formed, e.g., by applying a liquid formulation via an applicatornozzle as the membrane/spacer/membrane assembly is being laid out, or asit is being rolled if rolling of multiple lamina is performed directlyas shown in FIG. 1A. When sealing bands are applied to form dilute cellflow paths, these are preferably applied during the rolling process(FIG. 1A), while the concentrate cell paths may be applied either duringa preliminary rectilinear layout operation, or during a roll-formingprocedure.

Embodiments of the invention may be implemented with different sealingband patterns to achieve different patterns of desired flow.

FIGS. 11B and 11C illustrate a pattern of brine cell sealing bands foreffecting one basic spiral-brine cell construction. In this embodiment,the spacer mesh 115 is impregnated with a suitable sealant along firstand second sealing bands 116 a, 116 b extending along the top and bottomof the spacer (corresponding to upper and lower ends of the device inthe orientation shown in FIG. 1), above and below the bead-bearingcentral region 117 of the spacer between the two opposed membranes 120,110. This results in an envelope structure wherein the ends of themembrane/spacer/membrane envelope (the left and right ends in FIG. 1B)open to the interior of the envelope for providing and receiving theconcentrate flow. The sealant may, for example be a suitable (poly)ethylene vinyl acetate (“EVA” or “PVA”) material applied to both sidesof (and through) the edge of the screen, which otherwise constitutes aflow-permeable spacer. The sealant may be formed of another suitablematerial, e.g., a viscous, preferably curable, sealant or a stickytwo-sided tape effective to provide an impermeable seal extending forthe thickness of the spacer between and bonded to both membranes alongthe edges of the spacer assembly. In these constructions, the spacer inthe region of the sealing bands is preferably, but not necessarily, freeof ion exchange beads. When assembled with the membranes 110, 120 in arolled winding, the spacer then defines a brine flow cell having closedtop and bottom wherein the brine flows within, and may follow, thehelical winding space of the membrane roll between its inner and outerends. Advantageously, when the pattern of sealant is applied on thecomponent at the time of assembly, the various membrane and spacerlayers may slip to accommodate differential movements as the as the leafis rolled (with suitable tension on the webs) into a spiral. Suchslippage results in a substantially stress-free and buckle-free assemblyprocess; the sealant may further polymerize and cross-link to form astronger, flexible or inflexible, impermeable barrier between components(e.g., a “form-in-place” gasket). In other embodiments, however, a sealmay be achieved by placing flexible liquid-impermeable electricallynon-conducting strips between the membranes, for example, by placinggaskets along bands at the edges of the membranes and outside the screenarea. EDI devices of the invention may also be constructed that achievesealing by forming the spacer assembly itself with liquid-impermeableelectrically non-conducting rubber or plastic solid (non-mesh) edgesthat span the gap between the membranes, a construction similar to theone-piece “screen spacers” commonly used in brine cells of mostcommercial flat plate type EDI stacks which have a strip gasket formedby co-moulding around their periphery. However, in this case themodulus, finish and dimensional tolerances of the edge region gasketmaterial must be appropriately set to assure that the spacer edges willseal effectively against the surface of the adjacent membranes. It mayfurther be advisable to employ liquid sealant or gasket cement on therelevant membrane-contacting surfaces of the solid periphery. However,use of a viscous sealant applied through the spacer mesh, possibly withadditional lamina of mesh to provide a cell thickness identical to themesh-plus-bead spacer of the center, is preferred for its ease ofimplementation. In each case, the sealant, cement or gasket material ispreferably of a composition selected to be non-leaching so that it doesnot bleed solvent or polymer into the stream, and is of a compositionproven to tolerate the EDI conditions and the treatment or conditioningchemicals that may be present in the process flow. Sealants compoundedwith a filler material (such as titanium dioxide or other inorganicpowder) are similarly to be avoided. When the leaf structure or rollassembly is to be assembled wet (including soaked with a non-aqueoussolvent), it is preferred that the sealant or adhesive be compatiblewith such assembly, and when the assembly is to be sealed beforerolling, the sealant should be flexible, or non-hardening at leastduring the assembly process. It is also desirable that the curing ordrying of sealant not introduce such stiffness or dimensional changes asmight introduce mechanical stresses in the adjacent membrane, or causecracking.

Applicant has found a wide variety of adhesives to be serviceable. Theseinclude a two-part epoxy sealant for wet surfaces made by the HardmanCompany; a one part marine adhesive sealant marketed by the 3M Company;DAP two-part resorcinal glue; DAP liquid neoprene rubber cement; atwo-part polyurethane sealant of H. B. Fuller Company; Wellbond™sealant; and a one-part water-cured polyurethane sealer 4R-0215MF of H.B. Fuller Company.

FIG. 1C shows a cross sectional view of the spacer 115 of FIG. 1Bassembled between two membranes 110, 120 as in FIG. 1. The cationexchange membrane 120 lies on one side of the spacer, and the anionexchange membrane 110 lies on the opposite side, with the seals 116 a,116 b forming impermeable barriers at the top and bottom edges of themembranes. When rolled in the housing, the brine cells thus constitutethe helically disposed space between the two sealing bands. Fluid may beintroduced and removed at the inner and outer ends of the winding.

FIG. 1D illustrates a useful construction for applying or removing fluidfrom the concentrate cells formed in the membrane roll. In accordancewith this embodiment, the spacer element 115 comprises a screen, orseveral plies of screen, together with some exchange beads that maintaina desired minimum level or threshold value of electrical conductivity(not specifically shown), and as discussed above, and which generallymaintains separation between membranes 110, 120 and assures distributedsupport against pinching off of the inter-membrane flow space. A band orregion of the spacer, which may be one of the bands 116 a, 116 b or maybe a band placed elsewhere, such as at an end of the spiral, is closedby a further seal 119, and a portion of the screen adjacent the endremains free of such beads, thus offering a more open flow path anddecreased flow resistance. This open or unfilled spacer, if positionednear the inlet of the flow may advantageously serve as aflow-distributing region to efficiently allocate flow across the widthof the spacer into the adjacent region of bead loaded mesh;alternatively, when positioned distal to the inlet, it may operate as aflow-collecting outlet region to efficiently receive the outflow fromacross the bead loaded spacer mesh and conduct the combined outflow. Itthus presents a low pressure drop (at the inlet end for distribution) ora high pressure drop relative to the filled-path impedance (at theoutlet end) and low impedance outlet conduit that serves to define thegeneral direction of flow within the cell from a supply inlet to anoutlet.

A separate inlet/outlet conduit 128, such as a perforated tube, mayoptionally be placed in this area, to deliver to or collect fluidpresent in the low impedance unfilled screen, and in that case the inlet(respectively, outlet) tube may pass through one of the seals 116 a, 116b, 119 or other structure to connect with a vessel inlet or outlet portof the assembled device. Such port may be internal (when, for examplethe brine is fed by a bleed from the feed in, from the dilute mid-path,or from the dilute product out flows), or may be external as may bedesired when the brine is to be fed via outside piping, or is to beactively recirculated or have its pressure or flow set via an externalvalve or regulator. In general, it is expected that with the flow cellsdefined by an open mesh and the presence or absence of a relativelyspare filling of exchange material, the leaf or leafs of the spiral EDIdevices may be arranged to passively provide effective dilute andconcentrate flows by use of suitable seals, path lengths andintercommunicating path openings, without reliance upon circulationpumps or complex flow control systems.

The concentrate cell screen may have conductivity-enhancing material,such as conductive metal, polymer or carbon beads temporarily orpermanently fixed thereto or captured therein, to augment its structuralsupport and/or electrical conduction properties, either instead of or inaddition to cation exchange material. The inlet or outlet pipe, ifprovided to apply or conduct away fluid from the inter-membrane space,may be formed by a perforated stainless steel tube or other suitableconduit/distributor structure extending into the open (unfilled) mesh orextending along the sealed edge.

These elements of construction may be carried out to implement differentflow paths. FIG. 2A illustrates one such arrangement, showing an(unfurled) leaf 40 having a pattern of sealing bands 1, unfilled mesh 2,and bead-filled mesh region 3 forming a half-sealed envelope thatremains open along the bottom edge. The half-envelope is configured toreceive an inlet flow at the bottom. The low impedance unfilled meshregion 2 extending along the top edge promotes a generally upward flowthrough the filled mesh 3, parallel to the axis of the device, asindicated by arrows in the figure. The filled mesh may, for exampleemploy a 28 mil (0.7 mm) thick screen with a coating of 650 C cationexchange beads, to define brine cell regions 3 of suitable hydraulicresistance and good electrical conductivity, and a thicker unfilledscreen (e.g. 70 mil) may be employed in region 2 to maintain membranespacing while presenting lowered resistance that promotes the desiredflow distribution. As indicated by arrows in FIG. 2A, the flow followsthe pressure drop toward the unfilled spacer region 2, and then turns toproceed along an outflow path that branches, running horizontally alongthe top of the leaf to conduct the brine flow out both of the two ends(e.g., the inner and outer ends of the spiral when the envelope isrolled in an EDI device.) A short concentrate outlet conduit may beinserted into the outflow region 2 in the innermost and outermost turnsof the roll to connect this flow to one or more vessel ports. FIG. 2Bshows a vertical cross-section through several turns of the spiral woundassembly, omitting the electrodes, to illustrate relative directions ofthe feed and concentrate flow paths in the central treatment area of thedevice that occur with the leaf of FIG. 2A when the brine cell is fed atthe bottom (e.g., with the product water as illustrated, or with aseparate fluid connection of feed or conditioned brine). The feed waterproceeds downward along the axis of the device, while on the other sideof the membranes there is an axial flow upward from the concentrateinlet end which becomes a faster exit flow of the concentrate along theband 2 of unfilled mesh, which defines a spiral outflow path lying in agenerally horizontal plane at the top of the device. In general, whenfed from the feed or product flow in this manner, the concentrate flowneed be only a small portion, e.g., 1%-10%, of the total flow, and suchminor fraction may be automatically and passively diverted into theconcentrate cells by using suitable mesh and filling parameters. Thethin concentrate cells having some cation exchange beads retain, orquickly attain suitable conductivity even when fed with product water,and recovery is high. Apportionment or deflector elements or one or morevalves (such as a product back-pressure valve and/or a brine inletvalve) may be positioned at the bottom of the unit if desired to set, orto control or adjust, the amount of flow diverted to or passed into thebrine cells. Brine back pressure may alternatively be set at the brineoutlet to control brine flow.

These arrangements of the concentrate path present advantageousoperating characteristics. When using a single pass, rather thanrecirculating, brine fed into a filled cell, the product outlet end ofthe dilute may be highly polarized, resulting in very stable removalcharacteristics and robust ability to deal with upset or start-upconditions and changes in feed quality.

The leaf of FIG. 2A may alternatively be installed in an invertedorientation, with its seal band I positioned along the bottom or productout end of the unit. In that case, the concentrate cells may be fed in asimilar manner by a bleed from the feed, and both the concentrate anddilute flows will proceed along the same (downward axial) directionduring the initial portion of their path, with the concentrate flowturning to form a faster cross path near the exit end of the device.

Other path geometries are implemented in accordance with the inventionby employing different leaf sealing patterns, several of which will bedescribed later below with reference to FIGS. 5-7. These may includeleaves with an at least partly open (inner or outer) end, and at leastpartly open sides to define paths running in segments along one or morespiral directions. The seals provide great latitude in setting pathlength, path direction, and such characteristics as flow impedance,pressure drop and dilute/brine pressure difference.

In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a membrane/spacerleaf is fitted in a device fabricated with one or more electrodeassemblies that are implemented as a conductive electrode sheet windingparallel to the rolled leaf, and having more than a full turn ofelectrode surface such that a pocket is formed in an electrode overlapregion. The electrode forms a one-turn volute or helix, and the leafpasses into the radially-open gap extending between the end of theelectrode and the next turn. This construction positions the leaf flatand parallel against the electrode surface around its fullcircumference, and places the envelope end or termination in afield-free region, e.g., the interior of the electrode or pocket. Theenvelope/electrode geometry wherein the envelope remains substantiallyentirely parallel to a continuous cylindrical electrode contour, withoutabrupt turns or doubling of plies at the regions of attachment, andwithout projecting clamp structures, results in a more uniform fieldthrough the dilute and concentrate cells near the electrodes, free ofthe shadowing, inhomogeneities and shielding that arise from prior artarrangements of slotted openings, sheet clamping structures and thelike. When applied to the concentrate cells, it permits passage ofconcentrate through the electrode and into a field-free region whilemaintaining substantial isolation from the feed-product flow path, andthus avoids the problems of brine short-circuiting or back-diffusionthat may occur near the concentrate manifolds and electrolyte cells ofprior art EDI devices.

FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of an inner electrode and spiral-woundleaf, taken in a plane normal to the winding axis, illustrating such anelectrode pocket and termination of the membrane/cell structure, such asthe spacer/leaf structure of FIGS. 1A-1D, at the electrode in oneprototype spiral EDI device. FIG. 4 shows a corresponding view of anouter electrode structure for the prototype embodiment. Each electrodeis preferably formed of sheet stock of a suitable conductive sheetmaterial, such as stainless steel, titanium or platinum (e.g.,platinum-painted or or with its surface otherwise platinized) or otherinert or conductive metallic-surfaced sheet. Preferably a non-oxidizingmaterial, such as a platinum-surfaced sheet is employed for the anode.Ancillary structures such as suitable current leads, electricalconnector tabs and the like (not shown) may connect to the electrode andextend or electrically communicate through the vessel housing (FIG. 1),and the very end of a membrane, spacer or leaf may be affixed to theelectrode surface by a cement, by one or more fastening clips, ascrewed-down metal strip or the like (also not shown).

As shown in FIG. 3, according to this aspect of the invention, thecentral electrode 114 (corresponding to electrode 14 of FIG. 1) which inthe prototype device is the anode, is comprised of a wound sheet ofwhich the end regions 114 a, 114 b overlap in an angular sector 114 cthat extends for a few centimeters and in which the sealed ends of theleaf terminate. This overlap region forms an electrode pocket whichreceives the leaf end—membranes, dilute and brine spacers, and lies at asingle potential, so that there is no electrical field in the pocketregion. The pocket termination of the leaf, including spacers, may besealed, for example with a curable polyurethane assuring that the diluteand brine fluids cannot leak out or intermingle. The individual spacerand membrane layers may terminate successively, or with slight offsets,as illustrated, to form a tapered-end insertion, rather than abutt-ended insert, where the electrode's outer edge overlaps the innerone. The electrode winding thus fits well against the angled surface inthe pocket region and is fully supported. Thin foil or other metal sheetmay be used to form the electrode surface. The spacer/membrane roll liesexactly parallel and flat against the outer surface of the centralelectrode as the spacer/leaf exits the pocket.

In this prototype construction, the winding structure comprises arepeating sequence of four layers, namely a brine spacer assembly B, ananion exchange membrane A, a dilute spacer assembly D and a cationexchange membrane C. In the construction of the illustrated prototypewith a central anode, the brine spacer layer B extends for a length ofone full circumference of the central electrode, beyond the end of theadjacent cation exchange membrane C_(x). Thus, when the leaf is mountedin the pocket, the brine spacer B lies directly against the outersurface of the anode 114 for a full turn, and the adjacent dilute cellis bounded on the anode-facing side by an anion exchange membrane. Thefirst winding or end length of the brine spacer path thus functions likethe anolyte cell of a conventional EDI device. Preferably the anode,electrode 114, has one or more openings 114 d therethrough placing thebrine space in fluid communication, for example, with a port in thebottom flange as shown in FIG. 1, e.g., a brine port, permitting theconcentrate fluid to pass through the inner electrode.

The brine concentrate spacer and anion exchange membrane are placedadjacent to the electrode, and wound and sealed with the remaining pliesinto the pocket at the region 114 c, after which the leaf/spacerassembly is wound multiple times and then terminated at the outerelectrode. The outer electrode structure, one example of which isillustrated in FIG. 4, preferably employs a similar construction as awinding with a pocket. After winding the outer electrode, screws orother fasteners may be placed through the overlapping electrode layers,or the circumference may be banded and clamped to seal the unittogether. Thus one of the two electrodes conforms to the shape of thefirst turn of membrane/spacer assembly and the other one follows theshape of the last turn. In the case of the outer cathode assembly,termination may be effected by extending the brine spacer layer for alength of one full electrode circumference beyond the anion exchangemembrane, so that the final brine spacer layer lies directly against theinside surface of the outer electrode (the cathode, as illustrated), anda cation membrane lies on the cathode side of the next adjacent dilutecell. All or a portion of an electrode may be made from metal screen,wire or conductive mesh, rather than from a sheet of conductive foil, ormay include conductive mesh or wire on a support sheet, but conductivefoil is preferred. Furthermore, the foil (for example, a two mil [0.05mm] foil) may be wound several additional turns around the outside (whenused to form the outer electrode as indicated schematically in FIG. 4)so as to constitute a containment vessel for the assembly, or may beinitially wound for several turns at the inner electrode, beforeattachment of the leaf, so as to constitute a central pipe, making thecorresponding structural portion of the housing element, vessel orsupport unnecessary. In this case, one or more ports P as shown in FIGS.3 and 4 may be drilled through the electrode and fitted with suitablefittings to allow fluid communication through the electrode winding withthe brine cells.

FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of the outer electrode 116 formed witha similar wound sheet and pocket structure overlapping in an angularsector 116 c where the sealed ends of the leaf terminate. Theenvelope/spacer roll of the prototype is constructed so that here too,the brine spacer B lies adjacent the electrode surface, and communicatesthrough a suitable port P. When the brine spacer is a spacer as shown inFIGS. 1A-1C, constrained between two membranes sealed at top and bottom,then the concentrate flow passes through the spiraling concentratespacer layer B, and may pass directly through one or more of theelectrodes. When the brine envelope of FIG. 2A is used, having one openedge for receiving the brine inlet, the both the inner and outerelectrode ports may be brine outlets. However, in other embodiments, itmay be preferable to have the brine enter at one end of the spiral,e.g., at the anode, which is preferably the inner (smaller) electrode,and proceed toward the cathode so that the brine stream is initiallyacidified by anolyte and better resists scaling. In still otherembodiments, the brine layer need not lie immediately adjacent to theelectrode, but instead separate electrode spacer cells (electrolytecells) may be provided at one or both electrodes to allow a separateflow of fluid adjacent to one or both electrodes. This allows one orboth electrolyte flows to be supplied, treated or conditioned separatelyfrom the bulk dilute and brine flows, in a manner analogous toelectrolyte treatment of prior art EDI device constructions.

The foregoing examples illustrate several generally advantageousproperties. Spiral EDI units of the invention employ a relatively smallnumber of hardware and spacer components, and these are of low cost. Theuse of a sparse bead filling allows cells of small width to support highproduct flow velocities, and the roll sealing and assembly processallows path lengths to be readily defined and optimized to accommodateflows or apportion flows without causing occlusion orcross-contamination of cells. This also allows the EDI device to beeasily assembled in a dry or non-swelled state, without membranepre-treatment. Subsequent conversion (wetting and/or de-salting) thenleads to expansion and enhanced sealing as well as enhancedmembrane-bead contact and highly uniform electrical and ionicconductivity. Constructions with an envelope as shown in FIG. 2A thatseals the brine cell on only a single top or bottom end of the envelopealso allow the concentrate cells to be easily fed by a portion of thefeed or product water internally of the vessel. Furthermore, the use ofan inter-membrane pattern of multiple seal line segments to formbead-filled envelopes results in very efficient membrane utilization—upto 95% of the membrane area actively participates inelectrodeionization, far more than in current flat plate EDIarchitectures—and provides great control over flow direction in bothdilute and brine cells. The sparsely-filled mesh and unfilled meshregions have low hydraulic resistance which may be exploited to definedistribution or collection manifolds or determine flow direction andpaths within the device that are substantially free of channeling.

The spacer structure, consisting of one or more layers of mesh (e.g.,polymer screen) with exchange beads fixed in/on the screen efficientlydetermines the distance between membranes, providing both membranesupport and a medium for ion capture and transport, and effectivelyprevents migration or loss of the resin. Moreover, in localized regions(e.g., adjacent to a port or at the ends of the flow) a screen may beused with a smaller mesh sized to also serve as a bead trap, or withunfilled regions or a larger overall thickness intended to serve as aflow distributor or flow collector. Ion exchange felt or suitable (e.g.,polypropylene) cotton may also be applied near edges or at ends of thecontainment vessel to assure that the beads are retained in the unit, orin active treatment areas.

Thin constructions of a spacer with exchange beads, or a defined patternand distribution of bead types, are readily formed by attaching thebeads to the screen with adhesive, and specialized spacer assemblies maybe so formed before final rolling and assembly of the device. The screendimensions may be selected so the gap between any strand and one of twoneighboring membranes is smaller than bead size, preventing the beadsfrom moving around or clumping, and thus assuring effective flow aeffective exchange or conductivity characteristics. Spacing of theadjacent membranes in a roll may also be achieved by employing a “bumpy”membrane, i.e, a membrane formed with bumps or other features protrudingabove the nominal surface plane; raised portions of the surface thencontact opposite membrane. In this case, a screen or mesh is notnecessarily required to determine the inter-membrane spacing or theexchange particle distribution, and may be omitted in some embodiments.It should be noted, however, that in the past, it has proven difficultto manufacture exchange membranes with surface projections, andapplicant does not believe that any bumpy exchange membranes are nowavailable commercially. An alternative, however, is to attach scatteredion exchange beads to the surface of at least one of the ion exchangemembranes using, for example, a non-insulating fixation compound, suchas a soluble glue. The beads, once assembled contact the oppositemembrane (which may be similarly prepared) to determine the membranespacing, cell conductivity and/or ionic conductivity. The assembly maybe hydrated and swelled after assembly, which flushes the glue from theassembly, further enhances membrane-bead contact, and prevents the beadsfrom shifting position. In dilute cells, preferably ion exchangematerial placed between membranes by any of these methods is positionedso that the anion exchange mass contacts the anion exchange membrane onthe anode side, and the cation exchange mass contacts the cationexchange membrane on the cathode side. Because the quantity ordistribution of exchange beads remains limited, swelling will be smalland manageable in the device as a whole and should not impair either thestructural properties or the flow properties of the device. The unitsmay be rolled and assembled “dry” or using a non-water solvent differentfrom the solvent intended during normal operation. The solvent may thenbe substituted/removed after assembly, and the expansion of ion exchangematerial and membranes resulting from this conversion will assure goodcontact between components.

Homogeneous anion and cation exchange membranes such as those made byIonics, Incorporated of Watertown, Massachusetts were employed inconstruction of several prototypes. These are preferred because of theirstrength, relatively low swelling and limited transmembrane waterleakage. Heterogeneous membranes may also be used, but in the lattercase it is preferable that at least some degree of pre-swelling ormembrane hydration be effected before assembly, and steps such as webtensioning during a leaf rolling or assembly may require closer controldue to the lesser strength, greater swelling and general looseness andflacidity of heterogeneous membrane.

As noted above, the described constructions provide a flexible approachtoward defining different fluid flow paths within the spiral EDI deviceby suitable patterning of the sealing bands and manifold regions of anenvelope. FIG. 5 illustrates one embodiment of a two-membrane envelopefor defining spiral EDI flow cells, wherein the brine flow is fed at oneend of the cylindrical housing, between the center and the outside ofthe spiral, and branches to flow inwardly and outwardly within thespiral brine flow space. Each branch turns at the respective inner/outerend of a blocking seal 1 a to reverse its direction along the spiral,and reverses once more as it passes through the central opening betweentwo further flow deflectors 1 b, 1 c. The distal ends of the bifurcatedflow paths then pass out through openings at the inner and outer edgesof the roll, having followed two generally spiraling paths of lengthsomewhat greater than the length of the winding itself.

FIG. 6 illustrates another path configuration defined by envelope seallines 1. In this embodiment, the brine enters at the lower right corner,is constrained along two “race track” turns to travel approximatelythree times the spiral length, and exits at the upper left corner.“Lower right” and “Upper left” refer to the positions in the unrolledmembrane, but will correspond to positions at the inside (center) and atthe outside (periphery) at opposite ends when the envelope is rolled inthe device. Entry or exit may be effected by any means discussedabove—e.g., a conduit passing into the cell, an opening through abounding electrode or other construction.

FIG. 7 illustrates another configuration, similar to that of FIG. 5 butemploying separate inlets for the two brine flow branches that aremaintained separate while arranging the barrier seals 1 so that the twoflow paths are of different lengths.

The seals may further define flow paths that are restricted to theregion of the electrodes, for example by a seal line extend parallel tothe winding axis at the edge of the electrode region—that is a distanceone electrode circumference inward from the leaf end. FIG. 7Aillustrates such an embodiment, showing the glue/sealant bands (darklines and flow paths through a brine cell wherein the right-hand endcorresponds to the anode or anode cell, and the left-hand end to thecathode or cathode cell. As shown, the brine inlet flow b_(i) enters atthe bottom of the anode cell and is constrained to flow axially alongthe length of the anode by seal line s_(a) becoming acidic. Theacidified brine then turns along successive helical path segments a, b,c before entering the cathode area of the brine or catholyte cell, whereseal line s_(c) retains the flow in the cathode or cathode cell. Thedilute spacer covers only the area between the anode and cathode areaseal lines s_(a) and s_(c) away from the highly concentrated electrolytearea (see FIGS. 3 and 4), thus limiting effects such as back diffusion.Moreover, the initially acidified brine guards against the occurrence ofexcessively high pH conditions in the brine cell or at the brine side ofthe anion exchange membrane that might otherwise contribute or inducesusceptibility to scaling.

In addition to seals defining brine cell flow paths, devices of theinvention may employ seals to restrict or delimit the dilute flow paths,so that the spiral wound device effectively operates with the diluteflowing in a longer path or in series through two or more cells, becomesa two-stage device, or becomes a two stage device with different brineflows or path configurations for each stage.

Another important aspect of construction that may be employed in dilutecells of an EDI device of the present invention is to employ a screenmesh within the sparsely-filled dilute cell wherein the screen bothsegregates the different types of exchange beads, and deflects flow toassure adequate contact between the dilute flow and both types of beads.One construction, which the inventors refer to as s-layering, isillustrated in FIG. 8, in a schematic view, taken normal to the tangentplane of the dilute cell and along a line extending in the nominal flowdirection. As shown in FIG. 8, a dilute cell is defined between an anionexchange membrane A_(x) and a cation exchange membrane C_(x) such thatcation exchange material C lies adjacent to the membrane C_(x) and anionexchange material lies adjacent to the membrane A_(x). This may beaccomplished as described above by selectively coating opposite sides ofan adhesive-coated screen S with the different types of exchange beadsto form a dilute cell spacer assembly. The s-layering constructionaccording to this aspect of the invention is further characterized by aplurality of one-sided obstructions or flow deflectors D_(c) (positionedon the cation side to deflect flow toward the anion side) and D_(a)(positioned on the anion side to deflect flow toward the cation side)which are alternately placed across the general direction of flow todivert the flow to the opposite side of the dilute cell. The flowdeflectors may be part of the screen itself, such as filaments ofgreater height or cross-section running across the flow direction andprojecting on alternate sides of the screen by an amount that obstructsflow across a substantial portion of one side. Alternately, thedeflectors may be separately formed or placed, for example as filamentsor lines of sealant laid down at the indicated positions to deflect flowfrom alternate halves of the channel. The screen or spacer constructionmay also be effected using more than one layer of screen, or may beeffected by using screen or mesh formed of the corresponding ionexchange materials, in which case exchange beads may be omitted. Thisaspect of the invention is advantageously employed in flat plate EDIdevices of thin cell construction and is not limited to use in EDIdevices of rolled-leaf or spiral construction.

Various spiral EDI devices may be configured with membranes and spacersaccording to one or more of the above specific types. One particularlyadvantageous construction is achieved in accordance wit the presentinvention by providing a brine cell spacer having segregation bands thatextend across the general direction of the dilute flow (which may beaxial), and which operate to isolate the species entering theconcentrate cell near the front of the dilute path from the speciesentering the concentrate cell further along the dilute path. This aspectis illustrated in FIG. 9A.

As shown in FIG. 9A, a brine spacer, denoted generically B has one ormore bands BB that extend at least the full thickness of the spacer tocontact the adjacent membranes and constrain the concentrate flow withina horizontal (as shown) region which corresponds to an initial orsubsequent segment of the dilute flow path. Three such bands BB areshown, corresponding to different characteristic regions ofdemineralization along the dilute path as schematically illustrated inFIG. 9B. While certain species may be absent or of negligible effect inmany feed fluids, these regions illustratively include a first region aof the dilute path wherein cations in the dilute flow such as certainbivalent metal ions like calcium or magnesium enter the concentratecell; a second region b where monovalent ions and larger or less mobilehigher valence ions such as CO3, sulfate and the like pass from thedilute flow, and a third band c located toward the product outlet wherethe device may operate in a more polarized mode with substantialgeneration of hydroxyl and hydronium ions and their passage into theconcentrate cell. The bands BB separate these regions of the concentratecell into distinct and separate flow strips, so that flow of eachspecies or group of species proceeds along a separate path toward theconcentrate outlet or outlets. In this manner, the various complementarycomponents that might otherwise give rise to scale are prevented frommeeting. Certain species, such as the neutral gas CO2, which may passthrough the membranes relatively freely, back-diffuse into the dilutestream and re-enter the concentrate cell, may enter all the concentrateregions a, b, c, but at each location the absence of a componentsegregated elsewhere would render this combination essentiallynon-scaling.

The segregation bands BB may be implemented by several alternativemeans. One approach is to deposit a band of impermeable sealant along astrip to fill the brine screen spacer and prevent fluid movement acrossthe band. Another approach is to employ, as a spacer, an asymmetricscreen wherein the larger-dimension strands of a network extendcontinuously and parallel to each other for the full thickness of thespacer, while smaller-dimension cross strands permit flow to proceedparallel to the large strands. In this case, the screen spacing may berelatively small, with a mesh of 0.5 to 5 centimeters, so that the majorstrands would create dozens or hundreds of segregated concentrate flowpaths along a one-meter long dilute flow path, rather than the threegeneral regions illustrated in FIGS. 9A-B. For prevention of scaling, itis important that the bands be sufficiently distinct in composition thatthe presence of complementary scale forming species does not come aboutunder pH conditions that would cause them to deposit. This function canbe achieved by a few bands BB, or by the tens or hundreds of bandsprovided by orienting the strands of an asymmetric screen along thedirection transverse to the dilute flow.

The spatial separation of the relevant species may be enhanced or moreprecisely defined according to another or further aspect of the presentinvention, by arranging selected exchange resins in regions along thedilute path so as to selectively strip one type of ion in that region,or inhibit the passage of a complementary ion into the concentrate, thusmore quickly and clearly separating the scaling or other components.FIG. 10 illustrates this aspect of the invention, showing schematicallya dilute cell of a rolled EDI device (or of three devices arranged forserial flow. As shown, the initial region of the path, corresponding toregion a is filled with a cation exchange resin C to more completelycapture and transport the scale-forming metal cations into the upperconcentrate band, while more effectively discriminating against certainpotentially deleterious co- or counter-ions. A subsequent portion of thedilute cell has a filling of anion exchange material A to sharpen theremoval of the bulky or hindered sulfate ions and other components,while a third region or stage contains a conventional mixed filling ofexchange material for better polishing. Three separately-energizedelectrodes E1, E2, E3 may be employed to adjust or control operationmore closely for the specific distribution of material present in thefeed.

As noted above, embodiments of the invention address certain intrinsicinhomogeneities of prior art constructs by features such as a shieldedelectrode pocket for envelope termination, arranging the windings toavoid shadowing effects, and employing a relatively large core to limitthe increase in current density that occurs at inner cells of thewinding. In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the spiralis equipped with an end port structure that provides a compensatory flowprofile.

FIGS. 11A and 11B illustrate this aspect of the invention. A spacer S,which illustratively is a relatively large-strand mesh as described inApplicant's international application WO03/043721, is slotted to receivea plurality of tubes or rods T along one edge, and the screen and tubesare embedded in a fill-width sealing band. The band may be formed of apolyurethane or epoxy material which cures and provides sufficientflexibility to allow the screen to be rolled together with the exchangemembrane and another spacer as described above, into a rolled EDIassembly. The end of the rolled assembly is preferably then potted, in amanner similar to that employed for forming hollow-fiber MF modules, sothat all the membranes and spacers are sealed at the bottom (as shown)edge and the concentrate cells are well isolated from the dilute cells.The rods/tubes T project through the potting material. If rods ratherthan tubes are used, these may then be pulled from the assembly leavingthrough-holes communicating with the mesh S, which, like the tubes,operate as end-ports into the cells defined by the spacer S. As furthershown in FIG. 11A, the elements T are spaced at progressively greaterintervals toward one end of the spacer S. this results in a greaternumber of ports, hence increased flow at one end region of the spacer,which is preferably the inside (smaller diameter) portion of the rolledassembly.

FIG. 11B schematically illustrates this effect. The greater number ofinlet or outlet ports allows more flow, or higher flow velocity at theradially inner portion of the spiral, the region that also experiences ahigher current density. The fluid flowing in that region thus has ashorter residence time, yet may be treated to the same end point (forexample, 15-16 MegOhm conductivity, as the fluid passing through theouter windings, without causing excessive depletion and polarizedoperation. The result is a high throughput, uniform quality product,free of extreme or inefficient operating regions.

The devices described above thus embody a number of novel, inventive andadvantageous constructions for EDI devices that enhance the ease ofmanufacture, effectiveness of operation and overall performance orcapabilities of the devices so constructed. In the foregoing descriptionof illustrative embodiments, various novel elements and salient featureshave been emphasized, but these may be varied or supplemented withvariations of overall architecture and other details of constructionknown from the technical literature of flat plate and spiral EDIdevices, many of which are now on the market. Ancillary details relatingto aspects such as bead catchers, ports, valves and electrodeconstructions as well as operating control are well known to thoseskilled in the art, and may be applied with suitable modification to theconstructions described herein. The invention being thus disclosed,further variations and modifications will occur to those skilled in theart, and all such variations and modifications are considered to bewithin the scope of the invention as described herein and defined by theclaims appended hereto.

1. An electrodeionization device comprising a generally cylindricalhousing including a) a cylindrical inner core b) an inner electrodeextending around the inner core c) a leaf arranged as a spiral windingabout the inner electrode d) an outer electrode extending about thespiral winding, wherein active treatment cells are defined by spaceswithin said spiral winding and by interleaf spaces thereof, wherein oneor more sealing bands extend between membranes of the winding to definefluid flow.
 2. The electrodeionization device of claim 1, wherein saidbands are arranged transverse to a flow of fluid that is to bedemineralized, and are positioned and oriented to receive and maintaindifferent scale-forming components in separate concentrate cellchannels.
 3. The electrodeionization device of claim 1, wherein thesealing bands effect one or more functions selected from the groupconsisting of the function of a) defining flow paths of a length longerthan the leaf; b) defining a brine cell as an electrolyte cell isolatedfrom dilute cells; c) defining a brine path orientation relative to adilute path; d) defining brine flow such that the brine is acidified toresist scaling; e) defining a two-stage spiral EDI treatment device; f)defining pressure drops to induce flow in a desired direction; g)defining brine cell inlet and/or outlet port positions; and h) definingbrine path impedance that enables brine feed by a passive internal bleedfrom a feed or product flow of dilute cells.
 4. An electrodeionizationdevice comprising a generally cylindrical housing including a) an innerelectrode extending around the inner core b) at least one leafcontaining two spaced-apart membranes and arranged as a spiral windingabout the inner electrode c) an outer electrode extending about thespiral winding, and d) a plurality of seals applied in contact with saidmembranes in a pattern within said leaf and/or an interleaf space ofsaid spiral winding so as to define a pattern or direction of flow forelectrodeionization of a feed delivered to the housing.
 5. Theelectrodeionization device of claim 4, further configured to effect atleast one of a) said inner electrode is an anode; b) the device isarranged to acidify brine flow; and c) the membrane/spacer leaf definessparsely filled dilute and/or concentrate paths.
 6. Anelectrodeionization device comprising a generally cylindrical housingand including a radially inner electrode arranged in a generallycylindrical shape along an axis a plurality of spacers and selectivelypermeable membranes arranged in a spiral winding about the innerelectrode, and a radially outer electrode extending about the spiralwinding, dilute and concentrate cells being defined by spaces withinsaid spiral winding in a region between the radially inner and theradially outer electrodes, and wherein a separator band within theconcentrate cells separates different scale-forming components removedfrom fluid in the dilute cells and directs the components alongdifferent concentrate flow paths thereby avoiding or providing enhancedresistance to scaling.
 7. The electrodeionization device of claim 6,where the separator bands comprise one or more elements selected fromamong strands of a screen or mesh spacer, and bands of a sealantextending between membranes
 8. The electrodeionization device of claim6, further comprising ion exchange filling in the dilute cells arrangedto selectively enhance transport of said separate components into saiddifferent concentrate flow paths.